Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Warman, No. 05-4416

By FindLaw Staff on August 19, 2009 1:50 PM

Defendant's drug conviction and sentence are affirmed where: 1) sufficient evidence independent of hearsay statements showed that defendant was a member of the drug conspiracy at issue; and 2) any potential error caused by trying multiple conspiracies under a single indictment did not influence the fairness of the trial.

Read US v. Warman, No. 05-4416

Appellate Information

Argued: April 23, 2009

Decided and Filed: August 18, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Cole

Counsel

For Appellant:

Paul L. Nelson, Federal Public Defender's Office, Western District of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI

For Appellee:

Ava M.R. Dustin, Assistant United States Attorney, Toledo, OH

Copied to clipboard