Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Lack of Evidence Halts U.S. Attorney Firing Probe

By Tanya Roth, Esq. on July 26, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

A lack of evidence will bring a halt to any possible criminal charges stemming from the firings of nine U.S. attorneys during the George W. Bush Administration. One of the biggest domestic controversies of the Bush years comes to an end not with the bang of a gavel, but with a whimper. In a letter to the head of the House Judiciary Committee, it was announced that Nora R. Dannehy, an assistant prosecutor from Connecticut who led the investigation, was unable to find the evidence necessary to bring criminal charges over the firings of the nine attorneys. 

According to the Los Angeles Times, the investigation did find that former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales made statements to Congress that were "inaccurate and misleading" about the ouster of U.S. Atty. David Iglesias in New Mexico. Ronald Welch, an assistant attorney general, wrote in his letter to John Conyers, (D-Mich.) chair of the Judiciary Committee, that while Gonzales' statements and those of other DOJ officials were misleading, there was "insufficient evidence to establish that persons knowingly made false statements or corruptly endeavored to obstruct justice."

Further, reports the Times, Welch writes that the evidence is also not available to allow an expansion of the scope of the investigation beyond the removal of David Iglesias. Iglesias claimed that his removal in 2006 (along with eight of his colleagues) could have been politically motivated. At that time, then-Senator Pete Domenici, a New Mexico Republican, had talked to Iglesias about the status of a corruption investigation that, had it proceeded more quickly, might have have helped a fellow GOP candidate.

Despite the investigation findings, Congressman Conyers was not ready to let the Bush administration completely off the hook. In a statement he said, "It is clear that Ms. Dannehy's determination is not an exoneration of Bush officials in the U.S. attorney matter as there is no dispute that these firings were totally improper and that misleading testimony was given to Congress in an effort to cover them up."

Related Resources:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard