Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Are Term Limits for Supreme Court Justices Reasonable?

View of the US Supreme Court Building on a bright Christmas Day
By George Khoury, Esq. | Last updated on

Despite what it might seem, the United States Supreme Court is not an unchanging institution. It has been a bit bigger, and smaller, in its long and illustrious history. And most Justices seem to cozy up on the bench with their lifetime appointments for at least a decade, or a (seemingly) generation or two.

Notably though, one 2020 Presidential hopeful, Andrew Yang, has proposed a big change. If elected, he plans to set term limits of 18-years for SCOTUS Justices. Part of Yang’s plan also includes staggering the appointments such that in each presidential term, the sitting president will get two SCOTUS appointments, one in their first year, and one in their third year. In theory, the math checks out, but that’s not really the problem.

Justice Term Limits

The curious idea of implementing term limits for the High Court isn’t just some wildcard presidential campaign promise, it’s been around for some time now. Even the whole 18-year term, with appointments staggered every two years-thing.

But the fact is that the lifetime appointment was created for a good reason: To guard against partisan influence. Basically, because Supreme Court Justices serve for life and have a pretty high barrier for getting fired (impeachment), there’s less concern that the Justices will seek to curry favor among their political base (emphasis on the word “less”). If term limits were imposed, the Justices might be influenced to rule a certain way in order to lay the foundation for running for their home state’s Supreme Court, or another political office (or even to curry favor among private industries).

Given how the partisan divide on the High Court has become more visible, and High Court confirmation hearings can be complete media circuses, it makes sense that the term limit idea would be gaining popularity. One big draw back could arise in a two-term presidency, as it would effectively mean that one president would be appointing 4 Justices, which could cement the High Court’s partisan posture.

Related Resources:

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard