Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial Circuit v. Osborne, No. 08-6

By FindLaw Staff on June 18, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action seeking the evidence used to convict Defendant of sexual assault for the purposes of DNA testing, summary judgment for Plaintiff is reversed where, assuming Plaintiff's claims could be pursued using Section 1983, he had no constitutional right to obtain post-conviction access to the State's evidence for DNA testing.

Read the full decision in District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial Circuit v. Osborne, No. 08-6.

See the case docket. 

Appellate Information:

On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Filed on June 18, 2009


Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, JJ., joined.

Alito, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Kennedy, J., joined, and in which Thomas, J., joined as to Part II.

Stevens, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg and Breyer, JJ., joined, and in which Souter, J., joined as to Part I. Souter, J., filed a dissenting opinion.


For Petitioner - Kenneth M. Rosenstein, Office of Special Prosecutions & Appeals, Anchorage, AK

For Respondent - Peter J. Neufeld, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, New York, NY.

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard