Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int'l. Corp., No. 08-1198

By FindLaw Staff on April 27, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int'l. Corp., No. 08-1198, involved an antitrust class action in which the Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court's order vacating an arbitration panel's order allowing for class arbitration of the dispute.

As the court wrote:  "We granted certiorari in this case to decide whether imposing class arbitration on parties whose arbitration clauses are "silent" on that issue is consistent with the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U. S. C. §1 et seq."

The Supreme Court reversed, holding that imposing class arbitration on parties who had not agreed to authorize class arbitration was inconsistent with the Federal Arbitration Act, and the arbitration panel imposed class arbitration despite the parties' stipulation that they had reached "no agreement" on that issue.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard