Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Haynes Trane Serv. Agency v. Am. Std., Inc., No. 07-1441

By FindLaw Staff on July 06, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action for breach of a franchise agreement, judgment for Defendant is affirmed, where 1) Plaintiff presented insufficient evidence that his franchise agreement had been modified; and 2) Plaintiff's unclean hands gave the District Court authority to deny him an equitable estoppel remedy.

Read Haynes Trane Serv. Agency v. Am. Std., Inc., No. 07-1441

Appellate Information

Filed July 6, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Hartz

Counsel

For Appellants:

Marcy G. Glenn, Holland & Hart LLP, Denver, CO

For Appellee:

Daniel M. Reilly, Reilly Pozner & Connelly LLP, Denver, CO

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard