Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Hobbs v. Zenderman, No. 08-2099

By FindLaw Staff on September 02, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action claiming that defendants violated plaintiff's rights under the Medicaid Act and denied him due process by rejecting his application on the basis of unwritten, unascertainable standards, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) the statutory provisions upon which plaintiff relied did not confer private rights enforceable under section 1983; and 2) defendants did not violate plaintiff's right to due process, but simply applied a "sole benefit" standard to the particular facts of his case.

Read Hobbs v. Zenderman, No. 08-2099

Appellate Information

Argued: June 2, 2009

Decided: September 1, 2009


Opinion by Judge Lucero


For Appellant:

Duff Westbrook, Sanders & Westbrook, P.C., Albuquerque, NM

Maureen A. Sanders, Sanders & Westbrook, P.C., Albuquerque, NM

For Appellees:

Paul R. Ritzma, General Counsel/Special Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM

Mark Dawson Jarmie, Mark D. Jarmie LLC, Santa Fe, NM

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard