Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In an ERISA action claiming that a health plan administrator failed to assure adequate funding of the plan to pay all submitted medical claims, judgment for defendant is affirmed where plaintiff failed to establish that it was more likely than not that defendant's breaches caused the under-funding of the plan.
Read Holdeman v. Devine, No. 07-4235
Appellate Information
Filed July 21, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Ebel
Counsel
For Appellant:
Brian S. King, Salt Lake City, UT
For Appellee: