In an ERISA action claiming that a health plan administrator failed to assure adequate funding of the plan to pay all submitted medical claims, judgment for defendant is affirmed where plaintiff failed to establish that it was more likely than not that defendant's breaches caused the under-funding of the plan.
Read Holdeman v. Devine, No. 07-4235
Appellate Information
Filed July 21, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Ebel
Counsel
For Appellant:
Brian S. King, Salt Lake City, UT
For Appellee:
By William Peacock, Esq. | Last updated on March 21, 2019
It's quittin' time in three hours around these parts, which means one thing: running the clock out like an NFL team with the lead. You don't want to think, do...
By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on March 21, 2019
In US v. Billian, No. 09-3385, the Seventh Circuit faced a challenge to a conviction for drug and firearm related crimes, claiming that an officer's affidavit...
By George Khoury, Esq. | Last updated on March 21, 2019
This week, the High Court issued their first opinion of the Fall 2018 term. The case, Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido, involved the statutory...
By William Peacock, Esq. | Last updated on March 21, 2019
It's quittin' time in three hours around these parts, which means one thing: running the clock out like an NFL team with the lead. You don't want to think, do...
By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on March 21, 2019
In US v. Billian, No. 09-3385, the Seventh Circuit faced a challenge to a conviction for drug and firearm related crimes, claiming that an officer's affidavit...
By George Khoury, Esq. | Last updated on March 21, 2019
This week, the High Court issued their first opinion of the Fall 2018 term. The case, Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido, involved the statutory...