Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Murder-Related Habeas Matters

By FindLaw Staff on May 25, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In Bunton v. Atherton, No. 09-1152, a murder prosecution, the Tenth Circuit affirmed the denial of petitioner's habeas petition, holding that 1) the state court of appeals did not unreasonably apply Strickland in determining that defense counsel made a reasonable strategic decision to forego a witness's testimony; 2) petitioner's claim was barred on an independent state procedural ground; and 3) the cumulative error doctrine did not apply because the court did not find the existence of two or more actual errors.

In Hooks v. Workman, No. 07-6152, a capital habeas matter, the Tenth Circuit reversed the denial of petitioner's habeas petition, on the grounds that 1) the Allen charge given by the trial court in the midst of penalty-phase deliberations, when considered in the context of all surrounding circumstances, coerced the jury into returning death sentences; and 2) the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals' decision to the contrary was an unreasonable application of Lowenfield v. Phelps, 484 U.S. 231 (1988).

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard