Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Pacheco v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., No. 08-1046

By FindLaw Staff on October 05, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action for insurance proceeds arising out of a car accident, summary judgment for defendant-insurer is reversed where the policy's exclusion of resident relatives who own a vehicle from Uninsured Motorist/Underinsured Motorist (UM/UIM) coverage violated Colorado public policy and thus there were issues of fact regarding whether defendant properly advised and offered UM/UIM coverage in an amount equal to the bodily injury limits for that policy.

Read Pacheco v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., No. 08-1046

Appellate Information

Filed October 2, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Seymour

Counsel

For Appellant:

William Babich, The Law Firm of William Babich, LLC, Denver, CO

For Appellees:

Steven J. Dawes, Light Harrington & Dawes, P.C., Denver, CO

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard