Salisbury v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., No. 08-3316
In an ERISA action arising from a denial of disability benefits, summary judgment for defendants on limitations grounds is affirmed where defendant's benefit plan's limitations period was enforceable because the plan was not ambiguous and the limitations period was reasonable.
Read Salisbury v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., No. 08-3316
Filed September 30, 2009
Opinion by Judge Hartz
Jack Shelton, Wichita, KS
Patrick J. Kenney, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. Louis, MO
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Or contact an attorney near you: