Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Salisbury v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., No. 08-3316

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

In an ERISA action arising from a denial of disability benefits, summary judgment for defendants on limitations grounds is affirmed where defendant's benefit plan's limitations period was enforceable because the plan was not ambiguous and the limitations period was reasonable.

Read Salisbury v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., No. 08-3316

Appellate Information

Filed September 30, 2009


Opinion by Judge Hartz


For Appellant:

Jack Shelton, Wichita, KS

For Appellee:

Patrick J. Kenney, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. Louis, MO

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard