Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Springer v. Comm'r. of Int'l. Rev., No. 08-9004

By FindLaw Staff on August 31, 2009 5:38 PM

In a challenge to collection due process determinations issued by the IRS's Office of Appeals regarding plaintiff's tax obligations, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where, because plaintiff failed to articulate any cognizable violation of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) in connection with the imposition of the failure-to-pay penalties, section 3512(a) of the PRA provided him with no protection from those penalties.

Read Springer v. Comm'r. of Int'l. Rev., No. 08-9004

Appellate Information

Filed August 31, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge McKay

Counsel

For Appellant:

Jerold Barringer, Nokomis, IL

For Appellee:

Nathan J. Hochman, Attorney, Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC

Michael J. Haungs, Attorney, Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard