Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Bullcoming, No. 09-6010

By FindLaw Staff on September 03, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's embezzlement sentence is affirmed where: 1) defendant failed to show that the government had breached its plea agreement with him based on a witness's comments that defendant had not accepted responsibility; and 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in varying upward from defendant's Guidelines sentence.

Read US v. Bullcoming, No. 09-6010

Appellate Information

Filed September 3, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Hartz

Counsel

For Appellant:

Fred L. Staggs, Oklahoma City, OK

For Appellee:

Arvo Q. Mikkanen, Assistant United States Attorney, Oklahoma City, OK

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard