US v. Bullcoming, No. 09-6010
Defendant's embezzlement sentence is affirmed where: 1) defendant failed to show that the government had breached its plea agreement with him based on a witness's comments that defendant had not accepted responsibility; and 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in varying upward from defendant's Guidelines sentence.
Read US v. Bullcoming, No. 09-6010
Appellate Information
Filed September 3, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Hartz
Counsel
For Appellant:
Fred L. Staggs, Oklahoma City, OK
For Appellee:
Arvo Q. Mikkanen, Assistant United States Attorney, Oklahoma City, OK