Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Burgess, No. 08-8053

By FindLaw Staff on August 12, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a child pornography prosecution, the denial of defendant's motion to suppress is affirmed where the warrant authorizing the search of defendant's home possessed sufficient particularity, and the search did not exceed the scope of the warrant.

Read US v. Burgess, No. 08-8053

Appellate Information

Filed August 11, 2009


Opinion by Judge O'Brien


For Appellant:

Norman R. Mueller, Haddon, Morgan, Mueller, Jordan, Mackey & Foreman, P.C., Denver, CO

For Appellee:

James C. Anderson, Assistant United States Attorney, Cheyenne, WY

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard