Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Defendant's drug conviction is affirmed where: 1) the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to conclude that defendant provided cocaine for drug transactions; and 2) certain challenged statements by a prosecution witness were not hearsay because they did not depend on the witness's truthfulness, memory, or perception.
Read US v. Cesareo-Ayala, No. 08-3201
Appellate Information
Filed August 12, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Hartz
Counsel
For Appellant:
Rick E. Bailey, Conlee, Schmidt & Emerson, L.L.P., Wichita, KS
For Appellee:
James A. Brown, Assistant United States Attorney, Topeka, KS
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: