Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Lewis, No. 08-1170

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

Defendants' convictions and sentences for securities and wire fraud are affirmed in part where: 1) there was sufficient evidence of guilt on a challenged wire fraud count even though the victim did not testify; 2) defendant failed to overcome the presumption of reasonableness of his within-guidelines 330-year sentence; 3) neither defendant pointed to the admission at trial of any inadmissible hearsay; 4) an indictment need not charge aiding and abetting in addition to the substantive offense; and 5) defendant was not entitled to a Franks hearing because he did not allege that an affiant in support of a search warrant lied in the affidavit. However, one defendant's conviction is reversed in part where the government conceded that it had no evidence that defendant knew that his agent's sales pitch was fraudulent, and it failed to point to any evidence supporting the theory that defendant caused the agent to make any of her false statements.

Read US v. Lewis, No. 08-1170

Appellate Information

Opinion by Judge Hartz


For Appellant:

Jonathan S. Willett, Denver, CO

For Appellees:

Matthew T. Kirsch and James C. Murphy, Assistant United States Attorneys, Denver, CO

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard