Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Lovern, No. 08-3141

By FindLaw Staff on September 09, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a prosecution against pharmacy employees for dispensing unlawful controlled substances, one defendant's conviction is affirmed where: 1) Gonzales v. Oregon did not apply because there was no interpretive rule seeking to define a practice as lacking any legitimate medical purpose; and 2) the government adduced sufficient proof at trial that defendant's practices were not within the usual course of professional pharmaceutical practice.  However, another defendant's conviction is reversed where there was no evidence that he knew the pharmacy's managers and pharmacists filled prescriptions issued without a legitimate medical purpose or in defiance of professional standards.

Read US v. Lovern, No. 08-3141

Appellate Information

Filed September 9, 2009


Opinion by Judge Gorsuch


For Appellants:

Lee Thompson, Thompson Law Firm, LLC, Wichita, KS

For Appellee:

Mona Lee M. Furst, Assistant United States Attorney, Wichita, KS

Marietta Parker, Acting United States Attorney, Wichita, KS

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard