Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Masek, No. 08-1296

By FindLaw Staff on December 11, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's wire fraud sentence and restitution order are affirmed where: 1) defendant did not present evidence to bring the reliability of the government witnesses' conservative estimates regarding the loss caused by defendant or the district court's findings into doubt; and 2) the Sentencing Guidelines did not require a civil settlement amount to be credited against the loss figure for the purposes of calculating the sentencing range.

Read US v. Masek, No. 08-1296

Appellate Information

Filed December 10, 2009


Opinion by Judge Lucero


For Appellant:

Thomas P. Sleisenger, Law Offices of Thomas P. Sleisenger, Los Angeles, CA

For Appellee:

John M. Hutchins, David M. Gaouette and Robert Mydans, Office of the United States Attorney, Denver, CO

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard