Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US v. Phillips, No. 08-3272

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Defendant's conviction for obstructing an official proceeding, involving defendant's disclosure of the true identity of an undercover officer to a subject under investigation, is affirmed where: 1) 18 U.S.C. section 1512(c)(2) incorporates the nexus requirement as articulated by the Supreme Court in U.S. v. Aguilar, 515 U.S. 593 (1995); 2) section 1512(c)(2) does not require that a defendant know of the existence of an ongoing official proceeding; and 3) a reasonable jury could conclude that the natural and probable effect of disclosing an undercover officer's identity was impeding a federal grand jury investigation into a suspect's methamphetamine distribution and her supply source.

Read US v. Phillips, No. 08-3272

Appellate Information

Filed October 20, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Tacha

Counsel

For Appellant:

Dwight L. Miller, Topeka, KS

For Appellee:

Jared S. Maag, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney for the District of Kansas, Topeka, KS

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard