Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Decision re Retailer's Common Law Duty in Multi-Tenant Parking Lot Injury

By FindLaw Staff on March 18, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In Holmes v. Kimco Realty Corp., No. 08-4834, the court dealt with the issue of a tenant's common law duty to maintain a multi-tenant parking lot, in a plaintiff's suit against a retailer for injuries when he fell on the snow in the parking lot. 

As stated in the decision: "The signs at the entrance to the lot identify multiple tenants, not just Lowe's.  While a Lowe's customer will undoubtedly park as close as possible to that store, he could park anywhere in the lot."  Also stated in the decision: "Imposition of a duty on tenants in a multi-tenant facility also would lead to uncertainty with respect to the areas of the parking lot for which each tenant is responsible."

Thus, although the issue has not yet been addressed by the New Jersey state high court, the court predicted that the state would not impose a duty on an individual tenant for snow removal from the common areas of a multi-tenant parking lot when the landlord retains and exercises that responsibility. 

 

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard