Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Grier v. Klem, No. 06-3551

By FindLaw Staff on January 12, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a prisoner-plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. section 1983 claim against a county district attorney and a superintendent alleging that he was denied procedural due process rights by being refused access to rape kits for DNA testing, grant of defendants' motion to dismiss and denial of plaintiff's request for summary judgment is vacated and remanded as, in the narrow circumstances where a prisoner files a section 1983 claim to request access to evidence for DNA testing, that claim is not barred by the principles outlined in Heck.   

Read Grier v. Klem, No. 06-3551

Appellate Information

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Opinion Filed January 12, 2010


Before: Hardiman, Van Antwerpen and Fisher, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Circuit Judge Van Antwerpen


For Appellant:  Charles T. Kotuby, Jones Day, Anderson T. Bailey, John D. Goetz

For Appellee:   Matthew J. McLaughlin, Assistant Solicitor for Erie County

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard