Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Holk v. Snapple Beverage Corp., No. 08-3060

By FindLaw Staff on August 12, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a class action alleging that Snapple products were deceptively labeled, district court judgment is reversed where: 1) defendant waived its express preemption argument; 2) implied field preemption does not apply as neither Congress nor the FDA intended to occupy the fields of food and beverage labeling and juice products; and 3) implied conflict preemption does not apply as there is no FDA policy with which state law could conflict since neither the FDA policy statement nor the FDA's letter regarding the term "natural" have the force of law required to preempt conflicting state law.    

Read Holk v. Snapple Beverage Corp., No. 08-3060

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
Argued June 24, 2009
Filed August 12, 2009

Before BARRY, SMITH, Circuit Judges and RESTANI, Judge.
Opinion SMITH, Circuit Judge.

For Appellant: Lynne M. Kizis, Daniel Lapinski, Philip A. Tortoreti, Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer.

For Appellee: Van H. Beckwith, Jeffrey A. Lamken, Michael G. Pattillo, Jr., Martin V. Totaro, Baker Botts.  

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard