Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Marshak v. Treadwell, No. 08-1771

By FindLaw Staff on July 02, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action related to a trademark dispute involving the singing group "The Drifters," district court judgment is affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part where: 1) the court did not err in issuing contempt findings against the plaintiffs as they reassembled plaintiff's business under different names in order to evade the injunction issued by the district court judge; 2) the court erred in holding co-plaintiff Revels in contempt, as defendant never actually moved for him to be held in contempt, and he thus never obtained notice and a separate hearing; and 3) the court properly awarded defendant attorney's fees, but abused its discretion in refusing to impose any remedy other than attorney's fees, as plaintiff continued to evade the injunction and infringe the trademark. The matter is remanded for an order of accounting of plaintiff's profits. 

Read Marshak v. Treadwell, No. 08-1771

Appellate Information
Appeal from the Order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
Argued: March 10, 2009
Filed: July 2, 2009

Judges
Before: FUENTES, CHAGARES, and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by FUENTES, Circuit Judge.

Counsel
For Appellant: John A. DeMaro, Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.
For Appellee: Cindy D. Salvo, The Salvo Law Firm, P.C.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard