Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Thomas v. Carroll, No. 06-2282

By FindLaw Staff on September 23, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a case involving a pro se defendant convicted and sentenced for assaulting a corrections officer while serving a thirty-five year sentence, a denial of habeas relief is affirmed where state courts' conclusion that defendant's Sixth Amendment rights were not violated was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law as determined by the United States Supreme Court. 

Read Thomas v. Carroll, No. 06-2282

Appellate Information

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (D.C. No. 04-CV-00159)  

District Judge: Honorable Joseph J. Farnan

Opinion Filed September 22, 2009


Before:  Sloviter, Hardiman, Circuit Judges, and Pollack, District Judge

Opinion by Sloviter, Circuit Judge 


Counsel for Appellant:  Peter A. Levin

Counsel for Appellee: Loren C. Meyers, Gregory E. Smith, Paul R. Wallace

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard