Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Cesare, No. 08-2749

By FindLaw Staff on September 18, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Sentence of defendant convicted of bank robbery and armed bank robbery is vacated for the lesser included offense as district court erred by imposing separate sentences for each conviction even though it ordered the terms of imprisonment and supervised release to be served concurrently as defendant received concurrent sentences for lesser included offenses in violation of double jeopardy, as well as two separate special assessments constituting impermissible double punishment. 

Read US v. Cesare, No. 08-2749

Appellate Information

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Criminal Action No. 1-07-cr-00053-001)  

District Judge: Honorable Sean J. McLaughlin

Opinion Filed September 18, 2009


Before: Fuentes, Nygaard, and  Jordan, Circuit Judges 
Opinion by Nygaard, Circuit Judge 


Counsel for Appellant:Candace Cain

Counsel for Appellee: Robert L. Eberhardt, Kelly R. Labby, Office of the United States Attorney

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard