US v. Styer, No. 08-2951
Defendant's drug sentence is affirmed, where: 1) Defendant was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2) motion; and 2) the District Court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that Defendant continued to pose a threat to public safety.
Read the full decision in US v. Styer, No. 08-2951.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. District Judge: Honorable Legrome D. Davis.
(D.C. Crim. No. 02-cr-00570-001)
Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) on March 2, 2009
Opinion Filed on March 25, 2009
Before BARRY, WEIS, and ROTH, Circuit Judges
Opinion by BARRY, Circuit Judge.
Counsel for Appellant - Lawrence Singer, Esq. Suite 1010, 1617 John F. Kennedy Boulevard, One Penn Center, Philadelphia, PA 19103-0000
Counsel for Appellee - Bernadette A. McKeon, Esq. Office of the United States Attorney, 615 Chestnut Street, Suite 1250, Philadephia, PA 19106-0000
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.