Skip to main content

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Search by legal issue and/or location

Enter information in one or both fields. (Required)

US v. Warren, No. 09-1228

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Conviction of a defendant for bank robbery and using a firearm during a robbery at the second trial after the jury in the first trial was unable to reach a verdict is affirmed where: 1) double jeopardy did not bar defendant's second trial as defendant has not shown any error, let alone plain error, in the district court's decision to discharge the first jury; and 2) the circumstantial evidence supports a finding of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.       

Read US v. Warren, No. 09-1228

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division

Decided January 27, 2010

Judges

Before:  Easterbrook, Chief Judge, Manion, and Tinder, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Circuit Judge Tinder

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard