Skip to main content

Anderson v. AB Painting and Sandblasting, No. 08-2102

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In an ERISA benefit plan case, judgment reducing an award of plaintiff's attorney's fees on grounds that it was disproportionate to the damages claimed is reversed and remanded where, in the context of comparison between a plaintiff's damages and his attorney's fees, the notion that the fees must be calculated proportionally to damages is rejected. 

Read Anderson v. AB Painting and Sandblasting, No. 08-2102

 

Appellate Information

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Argued February 20, 2009
Decided August 20, 2009

Judges

Before BauerManion, and Sykes, Circuit Judges 
Opinion by Bauer, Circuit Judge.

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard