Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US v. Johnson, No. 08-3393

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Sentence for drug crimes is affirmed where there was no clerical error in defendant's sentence, as nothing in the record indicates that a relevant conduct finding involving the amount of crack cocaine was added to the overall sentencing calculation without the district court's knowledge or approval and thus there is no jurisdiction to change the finding under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. 

Read US v. Johnson, No. 08-3393

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
Argued April 2, 2009
Decided July 9, 2009

Judges
Before BAUER and FLAUM, Circuit Judges, and KAPALA, District Judge
Opinion by BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard