Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Matrisciano v. Randle, No. 06-1599

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

District court grant of summary judgment on plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim is affirmed where it was not clearly established at the time of plaintiff's transfer that the employer's action violated any constitutional rights and thus the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. 

Read Matrisciano v. Randle, No. 06-1599


Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois.
Argued November 6, 2006.
Decided June 26, 2009

Judges
Before RIPPLE, WILLIAMS, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard