Copyright Infringement Judgment Affirmed by Equally Divided Court
In Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S.A., No. 08-1423, a 4-4 split decision, the Supreme Court affirmed a judgment finding that Costco violated US copyright law by selling a particular line of watches without the watchmaker's permission. Justice Kagan took no part in the ruling.
Related Resources
By George Khoury, Esq. | Last updated on
The Google v. Oracle litigation over Java APIs is on its ninth year, and now, second appeal to the United States Supreme Court. Google has filed a petition for...
By George Khoury, Esq. | Last updated on
Trademark attorneys, brief your intake clerks, and tell them to get ready for the flood of unpopular clients. In a unanimous 8-0 decision, the Supreme Court...
By Casey C. Sullivan, Esq. | Last updated on
Will Samsung be able to blow up Apple's $399 million patent infringement award against it, or will its legal arguments spontaneously combust in front of the...
By George Khoury, Esq. | Last updated on
The Google v. Oracle litigation over Java APIs is on its ninth year, and now, second appeal to the United States Supreme Court. Google has filed a petition for...
By George Khoury, Esq. | Last updated on
Trademark attorneys, brief your intake clerks, and tell them to get ready for the flood of unpopular clients. In a unanimous 8-0 decision, the Supreme Court...
By Casey C. Sullivan, Esq. | Last updated on
Will Samsung be able to blow up Apple's $399 million patent infringement award against it, or will its legal arguments spontaneously combust in front of the...