Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Find a Qualified Attorney Near You

Search by legal issue and/or location

Enter information in one or both fields. (Required)

Clyma v. Sunoco, Inc., No. 08-5153

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Follow us

In a non-party's appeal from the district court's denial of an "Application for Permission to Interview Jurors for Instructional Purposes" pursuant to N.D. Okla. L.R. 47.2.1, the appeal is construed as a writ of mandamus and the district court is ordered to reconsider the matter pursuant to a meaningful exercise of its discretion in support of its ultimate determination.

Read Clyma v. Sunoco, Inc., No. 08-5153

Appellate Information

Filed February 3, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Judge Baldock

Counsel

For Appellant:

Mark Hammons of Hammons, Gowens & Associates, Oklahoma City, OK

For Appellee:

James B. Lebeck, Vinson & Elkins LLP, Houston, TX

John D.W. Partridge of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Denver, CO

Was this helpful?

Related Articles

Supreme Court: Green Card Holders May be Denied Reentry Into U.S. Without Clear and Convincing Evidence of a Crime

By J.P. Finet, J.D. | Reviewed by Joseph Fawbush, Esq. | Last updated on

The U.S. Supreme Court has made it easier for immigration officers to keep green card holders from reentering the country if they have been accused of a crime....

Supreme Court Takes Case on Constitutionality of 6-Member Juries in Criminal Cases

By J.P. Finet, J.D. | Reviewed by Joseph Fawbush, Esq. | Last updated on

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear Kian v. Florida, a case addressing the constitutionality of six-person jury trials used to decide most noncapital...

SCOTUS Re‑Draws the Line Between Habeas and Compassionate Release

By Vaidehi Mehta, Esq. | Reviewed by Joseph Fawbush, Esq. | Last updated on

When federal prisoners ask courts to revisit old convictions, the first question is not just who is right, but which statute they are allowed to use. A recent...

Blog Posts 1 of 3

Supreme Court: Green Card Holders May be Denied Reentry Into U.S. Without Clear and Convincing Evidence of a Crime

By J.P. Finet, J.D. | Reviewed by Joseph Fawbush, Esq. | Last updated on

The U.S. Supreme Court has made it easier for immigration officers to keep green card holders from reentering the country if they have been accused of a crime....

Supreme Court Takes Case on Constitutionality of 6-Member Juries in Criminal Cases

By J.P. Finet, J.D. | Reviewed by Joseph Fawbush, Esq. | Last updated on

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear Kian v. Florida, a case addressing the constitutionality of six-person jury trials used to decide most noncapital...

SCOTUS Re‑Draws the Line Between Habeas and Compassionate Release

By Vaidehi Mehta, Esq. | Reviewed by Joseph Fawbush, Esq. | Last updated on

When federal prisoners ask courts to revisit old convictions, the first question is not just who is right, but which statute they are allowed to use. A recent...

Need Help With a Legal Issue?

Contact a qualified attorney to find out your options for navigating the best path forward.

Enter information. (Required)

Find a Do-It-Yourself Solution

Copied to clipboard