Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

21st Centruy Ins. Co. v. Quintana, No. S154790

By FindLaw Staff on August 25, 2009 2:53 PM

In a case against an automobile insurance company, the Court of Appeal's judgment is affirmed where, although the made-whole rule applies in the med-pay insurance context and the insured must be made whole as to all damages proximately caused by the injury, liability for attorney's fees is not included under the made-whole rule.  Instead, a pro rata apportionment rule for attorney fees better allocates responsibility between the insured and the insurer.       

Read 21st Centruy Ins. Co. v. Quintana, No. S154790

Appellate Information

Appeal from San Diego County Super. Ct. No. GIC 87010.
Filed August 24, 2009

Judges

Before: BAXTER, J., GEORGE, C.J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., MORENO, J., CORRIGAN, J., KENNARD, J.
Opinion by CHIN, J.

Counsel

For Petitioner:   Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Peter H. Klee, John T. Brooks and Charles H. Danaher

For Respondent: Law Office of Robert S. Gerstein, Robert S. Gerstein; Huffman & Kostas, James C. Kostas, David Huffman; Law Offices of Sheldon A. Ostroff and Sheldon A. Ostroff for Real Party in Interest.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard