Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Brown v. City of Golden Valley, No. 08-1640

By FindLaw Staff on July 22, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action alleging excessive force by the police, district court judgment denying defendants' motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity is affirmed where: 1) the court did not err in concluding that the officer's use of force was not objectively reasonable as a matter of law; 2) the law is clearly established such that a reasonable police officer is informed that it is unlawful to Taser a nonviolent, suspected misdemeanant who was not fleeing or resisting arrest and posed little or no threat to anyone's safety; and 3) a jury could find defendant is not entitled to official immunity because he willfully violated plaintiff's right to be free from excessive force.   

Read Brown v. City of Golden Valley, No. 08-1640

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.
Submitted: December 12, 2008
Filed: July 22, 2009

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard