Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Edwards

By FindLaw Staff on February 16, 2010 12:53 PM

In US v. Edwards, No. 08-30055, the government appealed from a sentence of probation and restitution imposed on defendant, who pled guilty to bankruptcy fraud and making a false statement to a bank.  Defendant cross-appealed the restitution order on the ground that it was barred by collateral estoppel.

As stated in the decision:  defendant "filled out a loan application in Montana and indicated that he had significant assets," but "did not disclose the $3 million FDIC obligation arising from his [prior] Arizona conviction."

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the sentence on the grounds that 1) collateral estoppel did not preclude the restitution order because, although compensation to defendant's victims was the general issue in defendant's prior bankruptcy proceeding, the issue was not identical to the issue in the criminal proceedings; and 2) the sentence was not substantively unreasonable because the district court did not abuse its discretion when it considered defendant's history and circumstances.

Related Resources

Full Text of US v. Edwards

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard