Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In an Individuals with Disabilities Education Act action, the district court's order denying reimbursement to plaintiff-parents for their child's residential treatment is affirmed where: 1) the district court adequately responded to the hearing officer's conclusions before reaching a contrary result; 2) parents' failure to give notice was a relevant consideration when determining whether to deny reimbursement; and 3) the record contained ample evidence supporting the district court's conclusion that the parents placed the child in residential care to treat medical, not educational, problems.
Read Ashland Sch. Dist. v. Parents of E.H., No. 08-35926
Appellate Information
Argued and Submitted October 8, 2009
Filed December 7, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge O'Scannlain
Counsel
For Appellant:
Mary E. Broadhurst, Eugene, OR
For Appellee:
Andrea L. Hungerford and Nancy J. Hungerford, Hungerford Law Firm, LLP, Oregon City, OR
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: