Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Harrison, No. 08-10391

By FindLaw Staff on August 19, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's assault conviction is affirmed in part where, although the prosecutors engaged in improper questioning during cross-examination and improper vouching during closing arguments, the court could not say the prosecutors' misconduct affected the outcome of the district court proceedings.  However, defendant's conviction is reversed in part where the jury instruction on one count defined "force" out of the statute entirely by equating it with physical intimidation.

Read US v. Harrison, No. 08-10391

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted May 13, 2009

Filed August 19, 2009


Opinion by Judge Kozinski

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Bybee


For Appellant:

Peter C. Wolff, Jr., Office of the Federal Public Defender, Honolulu, HI

For Appellee:

Lawrence L. Tong, Assistant United States Attorney, Honolulu, HI

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard