Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Mohsen, No. 07-10059

By FindLaw Staff on November 30, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's perjury and fraud convictions are affirmed where: 1) the district court correctly instructed the jury on the materiality element of the perjury and fraud charges; 2) there was no use of the Phase II counts or evidence in the Phase I proceedings of defendant's trial, and thus the bifurcation process was not so manifestly prejudicial as to require reversal; and 3) the district court should have consulted the parties or counsel before responding to the jury's request to see the indictment, but the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Read US v. Mohsen, No. 07-10059

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted August 31, 2009

Filed November 25, 2009


Per Curiam


For Appellant:

Dennis P. Riordan, Riordan & Horgan, San Francisco, CA

For Appellee:

Amber S. Rosen, Assistant United States Attorney, San Jose, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard