Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Van Alstyne, No. 07-50105

By FindLaw Staff on October 22, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's mail fraud and money laundering convictions are affirmed in part where returning certain victims' investment in defendant's scheme was intended to "promote the carrying on," of the "scheme" at the heart of the mail fraud counts, by discouraging detection of that scheme.  However, they are reversed in part where another transaction that fully refunded one investor's outlay could not be regarded as a crucial element of the "scheme to defraud."  Defendant's sentence is vacated where the district court erred in calculating the enhancement to the money laundering sentence under U.S.S.G. section 2S1.1, in determining defendant's fraud offense level under U.S.S.G. section 2F1.1(b)(1), and in imposing the restitution requirement.

Read US v. Van Alstyne, No. 07-50105

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted March 9, 2009

Filed October 22, 2009


Opinion by Judge Berzon


For Appellant:

James H. Locklin, Sean K. Kennedy, Los Angeles, CA

For Appellee:

Douglas F. McCormick, Thomas P. O'Brien, Robb C. Adkins, Santa Ana, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard