Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Alvarado-Fonseca v. Holder, 10-1917

By FindLaw Staff on January 06, 2011 | Last updated on March 21, 2019
Mexican citizen's petition for review of BIA's affirmance of a deportation order

Alvarado-Fonseca v. Holder, 10-1917, concerned a Mexican citizen's petition for review of the BIA's dismissal of his appeal of an IJ's deportation order on the ground that his 1984 state court conviction for armed robbery constituted an aggravated felony.

In denying the petition, the court held that, because petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, his argument that Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, section 7344(b) bars his deportation, cannot be considered.  The court also held that, in light of the Supreme Court's statement in Padilla v. Kentucky, 130 S. Ct. 1473 (2010) that, deportation "is not, in a strict sense, a criminal sanction," Padilla does not provide sufficient guidance to deviate from the long line cases establishing that statutes retroactively setting criteria for deportation do not violate the ex post facto clause.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard