Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Arrow Gear Co. v. Downers Grove Sanitary Dist., 09-1509

By FindLaw Staff on December 10, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Suits under CERCLA against other polluters not barred by res judicata

Arrow Gear Co. v. Downers Grove Sanitary Dist., 09-1509, concerned plaintiffs' suits under section 113(b) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. section 9613(b), seeking to shift some of the costs to other polluters that plaintiffs had incurred as a result of having been found liable for groundwater contamination in a class action suit. 


In reversing the district court's dismissal of the suits as barred by res judicata, the court held that the defendants have no defense of res judicata to the present suits because there is no doubt that the settlements confine release to claims by defendants against one another concerning the allocation of the $16 million.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard