Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In an excessive force action brought under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983, district court judgment denying defendant's s motion for summary judgment is affirmed where the district court did not err in holding that defendant was not entitled to qualified immunity as a reasonable jury could find that defendant violated the plaintiffs' clearly established right to be free from excessive force when he seized and held them by pointing his firearm at them when there was no hint of danger.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division.
Argued January 6, 2009
Decided August 3, 2009
Before BAUER, FLAUM, and WOOD, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by WOOD, Circuit Judge.
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.Sign In
Create an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: