Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Bausch v. Stryker Corp., 09-3434

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on
Plaintiff's suit against manufacturers, distributors and sellers of a hip replacement device not preempted

Bausch v. Stryker Corp., 09-3434, concerned a plaintiff's suit against manufacturers, distributors, and sellers of the Trident-brand ceramic-on-ceramic hip replacement system, claiming that she has been injured by the medical device and that the defendants violated federal law in manufacturing the device.

In reversing the district court's grant of defendants' motion to dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground that plaintiff's common law claims were preempted by federal law, the court held that, because plaintiff's claims that she was injured by defendants' alleged violations of federal law are not preempted, her original complaint should not have been dismissed, and even if the original complaint had been defective, the district court abused its discretion by dismissing the action with prejudice and denying plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint.

Related Link:

Was this helpful?

Response sent, thank you

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard