BKCAP, LLC v. CAPTEC Franchise Trust 2000-1, No. 08-3239
In a dispute involving the correct interpretation of contract language, district court's judgment is remanded where resolving the intended meaning of the the contract on summary judgment was inappropriate as the contract language defining the Prepayment Premium was ambiguous.
Read BKCAP, LLC v. CAPTEC Franchise Trust 2000-1, No. 08-3239
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division.
Argued April 6, 2009
Decided July 13, 2009
Before BAUER, SYKES, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by TINDER, Circuit Judge.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.