Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

BKCAP, LLC v. CAPTEC Franchise Trust 2000-1, No. 08-3239

By FindLaw Staff on July 13, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a dispute involving the correct interpretation of contract language, district court's judgment is remanded where resolving the intended meaning of the the contract on summary judgment was inappropriate as the contract language defining the Prepayment Premium was ambiguous.    

Read BKCAP, LLC v. CAPTEC Franchise Trust 2000-1, No. 08-3239

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division.
Argued April 6, 2009
Decided July 13, 2009

Before BAUER, SYKES, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by TINDER, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard