Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Botvinick v. Rush Univ. Medical Center, No. 08-1966

By FindLaw Staff on July 24, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action for tortious interference with plaintiff's expectation of employment, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where plaintiff failed to create a triable issue on whether there was purposeful interference by the defendant that prevented the plaintiff's legitimate expectancy of employment from ripening into a valid business relationship, as he had no evidence that defendants prevented him from obtaining clinical privileges at the hospitals in question.    

Read Botvinick v. Rush Univ. Medical Center, No. 08-1966

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Argued April 6, 2009
Decided July 24, 2009

Before BAUER, SYKES, and TINDER, Circuit Judges. 
Opinion by TINDER, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard