Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Brock v. US, No. 07-3504

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Conviction and sentence for drug crimes and firearms possession is affirmed where the court properly denied plaintiff's motion under 28 U.S.C. sec. 2255 as plaintiff's claim that newly discovered evidence would have triggered the exclusionary rule if presented earlier is barred by Stone v. Powell's limitation on the exclusionary rule in collateral attacks.    

Read Brock v. US, No. 07-3504

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division.
Argued January 16, 2009
Decided July 22, 2009

Judges
Before BAUER, FLAUM and WOOD, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard