Consumer Products Research & Design, Inc. v. Jensen, No. 07-2599

In an action for fraudulent inducement and breach of contract, district court judgment against defendants is affirmed where: 1) defendant's failure to file a postverdict motion under FRCP Rule 50(b) forfeited all of their claims regarding insufficiency of the evidence; and 2) the court did not abuse its discretion when instructing the jury during the damages phase; and 3) the defendants failed to properly preserve an objection to the court's decision to not give the Party-In-Interest jury instruction during the liability phase of the trial.    

Read Consumer Products Research & Design, Inc. v. Jensen, No. 07-2599

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.
Argued September 16, 2008
Decided July 15, 2009

Judges
Before CUDAHY, FLAUM and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by ROVNER, Circuit Judge.