Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Consumer Products Research & Design, Inc. v. Jensen, No. 07-2599

By FindLaw Staff on July 16, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action for fraudulent inducement and breach of contract, district court judgment against defendants is affirmed where: 1) defendant's failure to file a postverdict motion under FRCP Rule 50(b) forfeited all of their claims regarding insufficiency of the evidence; and 2) the court did not abuse its discretion when instructing the jury during the damages phase; and 3) the defendants failed to properly preserve an objection to the court's decision to not give the Party-In-Interest jury instruction during the liability phase of the trial.    

Read Consumer Products Research & Design, Inc. v. Jensen, No. 07-2599

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.
Argued September 16, 2008
Decided July 15, 2009

Before CUDAHY, FLAUM and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard