Skip to main content

Ekstrand v. Sch. Dist. of Somerset, No. 09-1853

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In plaintiff's lawsuit against her former employer claiming that the school district failed to accommodate her seasonal effective disorder and constructively discharged her in violation of the ADA, judgment of the district court is reversed in part and affirmed in part where: 1) district court's grant of summary judgment on the failure-to-accommodate claim is reversed as plaintiff satisfied all three elements required for the claim; and 2) district court's grant of summary judgment on the constructive-discharge claim is affirmed as plaintiff failed to show that the conditions of her employment even approached the intolerable levels normally required in constructive-discharge cases.   

Read Ekstrand v. Sch. Dist. of Somerset, No. 09-1853

Appellate Information

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin

Argued September 14, 2009
Decided October 6, 2009

Judges

Before Easterbrook, Chief Judge, and Bauer and Evans, Circuit Judges

Opinion by Bauer, Circuit Judge

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard