Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Emerson v. Shaw, No. 07-3160

By FindLaw Staff on July 30, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court's denial of plaintiff's petition for habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) the court did not unreasonably apply Strickland in concluding that petitioner's counsel was not ineffective and that he was not prejudiced by the allegedly deficient defense; and 2) it was not unreasonable for the court to conclude that even if plaintiff's counsel objected to the disputed instruction and preserved his argument under Childs, plaintiff could still not show prejudice under Strickland and would not have been resentenced.    

Read Emerson v. Shaw, No. 07-3160

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Argued: September 12, 2008
Decided: July 30, 2009

Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and SYKES and TINDER, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by SYKES, Circuit Judge.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard