Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Feinberg v. RM Acquisition, LLC, 10-1890

By FindLaw Staff on January 06, 2011 | Last updated on March 21, 2019
ERISA action

Feinberg v. RM Acquisition, LLC, 10-1890, concerned plaintiffs' ERISA action against the defendant-purchaser of their former employer's company, claiming that the defendant is liable for the benefits promised by the plan because it is the "de facto plan administrator."

In affirming the district court's grant of defendant's motion to dismiss the suit for failure to state a claim, the court held that plaintiffs have not made a case for successor liability under section 502 as defendant did not assume the top hat plan's liabilities, nor did it connive with the former employer to deprive participants of their top hat benefits, nor was it a mere continuation of the former employer under another name.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard